Competitive Advantage Analysis
VHP® vs iHP™
STERAMIST® iHP™ | vs | CHLORINE DIOXIDE |
|---|---|---|
| APPLICATION | ||
| ionized Hydrogen Peroxide (iHP™) can be applied to every surface, including sensitive electronics. | May cause progressive damage to room surfaces and equipment not protected from fumigation. | |
| UV INTERACTION | ||
| SteraMist® iHP™ is unaffected by the presence of UV lights. | Requires shutoff of lights, as chlorine dioxide breaks down in the presence of UV rays. | |
| OPERATION | ||
| Does not require room preconditioning, and point-and-spray application requires no rinsing or wiping. | Five Stage Operation: Preconditioning, Conditioning, Charging, Controlled Air, and Aeration. | |
| ODOR | ||
| SteraMist® iHP™ leaves no odor. | Smell of chlorine remains after treatment. | |
| STARTUP & PLACEMENT | ||
| SteraMist® automation allows for remote start, and the unit can remain in the area being treated. | Units should not be exposed to fumigant yet must remain in treated area to avoid inadvertent vent leaks. | |
